Archive for the ‘real estate’ Category

Fast & Easy Problems

Friday, May 2nd, 2008
TheWall Street Journal had a very disturbing story on Wednesday about the “Fast and Easy” loan program of Countrywide Financial Corporation, many of whose mortgages were bought up by Fannie Mae.
 
Some of the problems are surfacing in a mortgage program called “Fast and Easy,” in which borrowers were asked to provide little or no documentation of their finances, according to people with knowledge of a Federal probe and to former Countrywide employees.  Fast and Easy borrowers aren’t required to produce pay stubs or tax forms to substantiate their claimed earnings. In many cases, Countrywide didn’t even require loan officers to verify employment, according to an October 2006 presentation by Countrywide’s consumer-lending division. That left the program vulnerable to abuse by Countrywide loan officers and outside mortgage brokers seeking loans for customers who might have been turned away if their finances had been more closely scrutinized, according to three current and former Countrywide senior executives and to several mortgage brokers who arranged loans through the program.
 
Both Countrywide and Fannie Mae, the government-sponsored company that bought many of the loans, classify the loans as “prime,” meaning low-risk.  A Fannie spokesman agreed that the verification of employment wasn’t required on all loans, but added that Countrywide was expected to verify employment details on a “sampling” of loans. The Countrywide spokesman said his company fulfilled that obligation.
 
In a related article from Bloomberg.com, its interesting to note that Bank of America Corporation. the second- biggest U.S. bank, said it may not guarantee $38.1 billion of Countrywide Financial Corporation’s debt after taking over the mortgage lender, increasing the likelihood of a default.“There is no assurance that any such debt would be redeemed, assumed or guaranteed,” the bank said in an April 30 regulatory filing, adding that no decision has been reached. Investors had grown more optimistic the bank would back Countrywide debt, and Standard & Poor’s said this week it may raise Countrywide’s rating to match Bank of America’s.

Flawed Home Price Data?

Friday, May 2nd, 2008
San Francisco (MarketWatch) — Commonly cited measures of US home prices are overstating the degree to which the vest majority of Americans’ home values have declined in the last year, producers of two of the most widely tracked indexes acknowledged this week.

 
Top officials with the National Association of Realtors and Standard & Poor’s, which issues the S & P / Case-Shiller Home Price Index, agreed this week their monthly reports are giving imprecise readings of price changes at all levels — national, state, and regionally — due to rare market conditions that are skewing survey results.
 
NAR reported last week that US median home prices fell 7.7% in March from a year ago.  The decline resulted largely from a market anomaly — a steep decline in costlier home sales due to tighter lending standards and high jumbo-mortgage rates coupled with a foreclosure-driven spike in cheaper homes.
 
“If there are a lot more homes sold on the low end and fewer on the high end, the median price is bound to drop dramatically,” NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun said.  “In normal times, a median price would reflect typical homeowner equity changes, but these are not normal times.  The jumbo [mortgage] market is frozen and the buying activity is more concentrated in lower value homes.”
 
The S & P / Case-Shiller Index, which Tuesday posted a 12.7% decline for February, is skewed for two reasons of its own — it tracks just 20 major markets (many among the hardest hit) and its “repeat sales” survey by design pulls individual homes both bought and sold in the last few years.  Many of those are now being dumped by distressed home owners and investors who bought at peak market prices and face higher mortgage rate adjustments.
 
The misleading home value figures are just one example of recently sketchy readings of the US economy.  US consumer confidence readings, for instance, have been wildly divergent.  NAR’s Yun said the financial media is seizing on the gloomy numbers and providing little analysis or historical perspective.  He freely admits that NAR’s readings are not accurately reflecting what’s happening with home values for the overwhelming majority of Americans.

 

Are Reverse Mortgages a good idea?

Friday, May 2nd, 2008
If you’re not familiar with reverse mortgages, the name is appropriate.  The reverse mortgage basically works backwards to a traditional mortgage.  Instead of paying the lender every month, the lender pays the borrower either monthly or in one lump sum (or in a combination of these choice), ostensibly so senior homeowners can live out their golden years in comfort. 
 
The amount of money available is based on current interest rates, lending limits, the equity available in the home, age of the borrower, and life expectancy.  No payments are due while the reverse mortgage is still outstanding.  It is repaid when the borrower (or in the case of couples, the sole remaining spouse) dies.  The borrower can never owe more than the house is worth, no matter when it is given up and regardless of market conditions.  If the house does sell for more than the balance owed on the reverse mortgage, the excess after all closing expenses are paid, goes to the borrower.
 
But the reverse mortgage, much like the Option ARM discussed in a previous issue, is not a “one size fits all” solution for all consumers.  And there is definitely an air of “buyer beware” when it comes to reverse mortgage products and the professionalism of the mortgage lender offering the product.  A few scam artists have found this product and are hawking it to unsuspecting homeowners.
 
With some 40 million Americans already 62 or older and another 79 million Baby Boomers heading into their senior years, the potential for reverse mortgages is bright.  Tomorrow’s reverse mortgage products will probably include products for various life stages, not just aging because borrower’s requirements change as they age.  The most important thing anyone considering a reverse mortgage can do to protect themselves is engage in face-to-face counseling from an independent, government approved third party counseling agency, such as AARP (800-209-8085).

New Broker Education Requirements

Wednesday, April 16th, 2008
Effective April 7, 2008, all mortgage brokers who currently maintain a Colorado mortgage broker’s license must complete 40 hours of education and pass the two-part exam by January 1, 2009.
 
The 40-hour course is divided into four sections including 7.5 hours of Federal regulations, 12.0 hours of Colorado laws, regulations, and contracts, 16.0 hours of basic mortgage training, and 4.5 hours best business practices.  Currently there are six approved education providers offering the Colorado-approved coursework. 
 
Upon completion of the 40-hour class time, all mortgage brokers will have to pass a test administered by PSI.  The test will be made up of 100 questions divided into two sections.  The largest section of 60 questions will include Federal and State laws and regulations.  The second, smaller section of 40 questions will include mortgage concepts, math, programs, and procedures.  The test will take 2 hours and a score of 70% or greater will be required for licensing.
 
Beginning in January 2009, all applicants for a mortgage brokerage license in Colorado will have to complete the coursework and pass the test prior to application.
 
This is the first time education has been required for mortgage brokers in Colorado and is a huge step to improving the overall quality of mortgage brokers operating in the state.